<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>StanleyWong.org &#187; Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stanleywong.org/category/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stanleywong.org</link>
	<description>Musings from the Interactive Adman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/awesome-new-apple-online-ad-on-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/awesome-new-apple-online-ad-on-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SWong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactive Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how this integrates with the context of the page and goes outside of the box to do something unexpected for users.  The ad takes the &#8220;I&#8217;m a Mac. I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; to the online advertising realm by taking advantage of the space provided by standard LREC and Leaderboard banners.  Very creative. Also check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how this integrates with the context of the page and goes outside of the box to do something unexpected for users.  The ad takes the &#8220;I&#8217;m a Mac. I&#8217;m a PC&#8221; to the online advertising realm by taking advantage of the space provided by standard LREC and Leaderboard banners.  Very creative.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9_8yIBw4iwc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9_8yIBw4iwc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
<p>Also check out a review from Ad Age&#8230;<a title="Apple Ad on WSJ" href="http://adage.com/garfield/post?article_id=136697" target="_blank"> here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/awesome-new-apple-online-ad-on-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Time Streams becoming more relevant</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/23/</link>
		<comments>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SWong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactive Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article on TechCrunch today about &#8220;Jump Into the Stream&#8221; and how we are in an interesting shift to real time streamed information.  The biggest challenge is to make sense of this deluge of information and to figure out what is meaningful and what is meaningless. With Google making some rumbling about real time search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article on TechCrunch today about &#8220;<a title="TechCrunch Jump Into the Stream" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/17/jump-into-the-stream/" target="_blank">Jump Into the Stream</a>&#8221; and how we are in an interesting shift to real time streamed information.  The biggest challenge is to make sense of this deluge of information and to figure out what is meaningful and what is meaningless.</p>
<p>With Google making some rumbling about real time search this is going to get really interesting.  Much like SEO is used to drive traffic to web 1.0 websites, social bookmarking and social discovery was used to drive traffic to websites in Web 2.0.  Web 3.0 may be where we see another source of traffic generation through different real time feeds and streams.  An indication of this is <a title="How Twitter &amp; Facebook Now Compete with Google" href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/05/15/how-twitter-and-facebook-now-compete-with-google/" target="_blank">Mark Cuban&#8217;s recent blog post</a> about how he is getting more and more traffic from twitter and facebook than Google.  In his case it is definitely Streams (Facebook + Twitter) &gt; SEO (Google).</p>
<p>Very intent to see where this leads us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stanleywong.org/2009/05/18/23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowdsourcing is Really Self-Organization</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2007/03/23/crowdsourcing-is-really-self-organization/</link>
		<comments>http://stanleywong.org/2007/03/23/crowdsourcing-is-really-self-organization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SWong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/2007/03/23/crowdsourcing-is-really-self-organization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just came across this very interesting article on &#8220;Crowdsourcing: A Million Heads are Better Than One.&#8221; The article talks about examples of harnessing human behaviors and interactions into three distinct areas: Creation (Ex. Open Source Software, Wikipedia) Prediction (Ex. Pickspal.com, Stockpickr, American Idol) Organization (Ex. Google&#8217;s PageRank, Digg.com, DMOZ) The concept of crowdsourcing is really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across this very interesting article on &#8220;<a target="_blank" title="Crowdsourcing" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/crowdsourcing_million_heads.php">Crowdsourcing: A Million Heads are Better Than One</a>.&#8221;  The article talks about examples of harnessing human behaviors and interactions into three distinct areas:</p>
<ol>
<li>Creation (Ex. Open Source Software, Wikipedia)</li>
<li>Prediction (Ex. Pickspal.com, Stockpickr, American Idol)</li>
<li>Organization (Ex. Google&#8217;s PageRank, Digg.com, DMOZ)</li>
</ol>
<p>The concept of crowdsourcing is really interesting in that it is really self-organization where seemingly chaotic conditions goes through a phase transition to bring about some sort of order. You can find self-organization everywhere from diverse subjects such as nature (Ex. Ants), business (Ex. market bubbles), physics (Ex. equilibrium thermodynamics), chemistry (Ex. chemical reactions), Entertainment (Ex. American Idol, Billboard Music Charts), and of course the Web.</p>
<p>Value is created when one can harness the power to create structure from unstructured chaos.  In Physics, this phenomena can be described in mathematics.Â  This is very much the problem that our team at <a title="Search Physics" target="_blank" href="http://www.searchphysics.com/">Search Physics</a> have been trying to tackle when it comes to organizing the information on the Web.  Stay tuned for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stanleywong.org/2007/03/23/crowdsourcing-is-really-self-organization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harnessing Consumer Voice to Improve Products &amp; Customer Experience</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2007/02/25/harnessing-consumer-voice-to-improve-products-customer-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://stanleywong.org/2007/02/25/harnessing-consumer-voice-to-improve-products-customer-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SWong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant! I am very impressed by the recent release of several Digg style user feedback and voting mechanisms applied to improving companies and products. There are two forward thinking companies who have gained quite a bit of press: Dell Ideastorm &#8211; No doubt part of the effort to revive the fortunes of Dell now that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!  I am very impressed by the recent release of several Digg style user feedback and voting mechanisms applied to improving companies and products. There are two forward thinking companies who have gained quite a bit of press:</p>
<ul />
<ol>
<li><a title="Dell IdeaStorm" href="http://www.dellideastorm.com/">Dell Ideastorm</a> &#8211; No doubt part of the effort to revive the fortunes of Dell now that Michael Dell is back at the helm.  Makes Dell more open and responsive to consumers.  Much better than a canned survey from a market research firm since the suggestions are unedited and can be voted upon.  I absolutely love the fact that it requires registration so Dell can continue a dialog with these consumers who obviously care.</li>
<li><a title="Yahoo! Suggestions" href="http://suggestions.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Suggestions</a> &#8211; The Yahoo! Suggestions board is being used to gather feedback for quite a few number Yahoo! properties (15 at launch) from Autos to Real Estate.  A pretty good first start.  The only wish I have is Yahoo! should really promote this a lot more.  A lot of the suggestion boards don&#8217;t have a lot of traffic nor enough feedback to form a critical mass.</li>
</ol>
<ul />I know that there are a lot of folks in the blogosphere who decry these efforts as <a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Yahoo_Shamelessly_Rips_Off_Digg_and_Brags_About_It">blatant rip-offs of Digg</a>, but I think all of these folks miss the point.  As a marketer, the hardest thing to do is to create a vibrant and constructive dialog with the consumer.  These &#8220;Digg-like&#8221; Web 2.0 features merely make customer feedback much more accessible, cost effective, and with the added benefit of sifting out issues that are more important than other due to open voting.  Remember, Digg didn&#8217;t invent voting nor did it invent ranking.  Digg&#8217;s great breakthrough was they packaged it in such a way which was brilliantly easy.  Besides, <a href="http://drupal.org/cases">Drupal</a> had this feature in their content management system since 2000.It would be great if brand marketers and product managers across different industries embrace harnessing the consumer voice to improve products and customer experience.   Imagine if car enthusiasts had this capability to suggest new features and product wishes for their favorite vehicles (Detroit anyone?).  Or how about struggling airlines use this capability to markedly improve flight service and give us options for better food on flights.  It would be very easy for old line companies to begin offering these capabilities by leveraging open source solutions like <a title="Pligg CMS" href="http://www.pligg.com/">Pligg</a> (an open source version of Digg).</p>
<p>Remember, companies exists to fulfill and capitalize on a market demand or consumer desire, what better way than to get this feedback directly from your customer&#8217;s mouth?</p>
<p>Update:  <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/02/16/dell-rips-off-digg-another-diggstorm-in-the-making/">Peter Cashmore</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/16/dell-pays-tribute-to-digg-with-new-ideastorm-site/#comments">TechCrunch</a> has a pretty interesting post about this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stanleywong.org/2007/02/25/harnessing-consumer-voice-to-improve-products-customer-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Yahoo! Buzz Index Patent Has Been Granted</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2007/01/12/my-yahoo-buzz-index-patent-has-been-granted/</link>
		<comments>http://stanleywong.org/2007/01/12/my-yahoo-buzz-index-patent-has-been-granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SWong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, I found out the patent for the Yahoo! Buzz Index (US Patent 7,146,416) was granted. I had a great time working with Janice Yoo, Elliot Yasnovsky, and KT Lim on building this project. From Search Engine Land: Yahoo&#8217;s Buzz This patent had me wondering how Yahoo presently measures trends in topics searched for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, I found out the patent for the <a title="Yahoo! Buzz Index" target="_blank" href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Buzz Index</a> (<a title="Buzz Index Patent" target="_blank" href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=7,146,416.PN.&#038;OS=PN/7,146,416&#038;RS=PN/7,146,416">US Patent 7,146,416</a>) was granted.  I had a great time working with Janice Yoo, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/ab/b12">Elliot Yasnovsky</a>, and KT Lim on building this project.  From <a target="_blank" href="http://searchengineland.com/061206-124914.html">Search Engine Land</a>:</p>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div><strong>Yahoo&#8217;s Buzz</strong></div>
<div>This patent had me wondering how Yahoo presently measures trends in topics  searched for on their search engine and portal, selected in their directory, and  from people&#8217;s usage of the many services they offer; and how the company might  be analyzing and using that information.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=7,146,416.PN.&#038;OS=PN/7,146,416&#038;RS=PN/7,146,416">Web  site activity monitoring system with tracking by categories and terms</a><br />
Invented by Janet Yoo, Kian-Tat Lim, Stanley Ben Wong, and Elliott  Yasnokvsky<br />
Assigned to Yahoo<br />
US Patent 7,146,416<br />
Granted December 5,  2006<br />
Filed September 1, 2000</div>
<div>Abstract</p>
<blockquote>
<div>A traffic monitor provides statistics of traffic using an activity input  for receiving data related to activity on a server system. Events being  monitored are binned by topic or term, where the terms are associated with  categories. The categories can be a hierarchy of categories and subcategories,  with terms being in one or more categories. The categorized events include page  views and search requests and the results might be normalized over a field of  events and a result output for outputting results of the normalizer as the  statistical analyses of traffic.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>The Yahoo! Buzz Index goes way beyond what you see on the public version of the site. Back when I was at Yahoo! we conceived of this product as a marketing dashboard that would give you all types of insight on arguably one of the largest online panels in the world.<br />
The <a title="Yahoo! Buzz Index Client Version" target="_blank" href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/client/">client version of the Buzz Index</a> empowers marketers to slice and dice data to find out aggregate information (without personally identifiable information) about who was engaging with a brand, concept, or search term.  These insights leverages Yahoo!&#8217;s unparalleled number of consumer profiles (over 250 Million when I last looked).  <a title="Google Zeigeist" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html">Google&#8217;s Zeigeist</a> and <a title="Google Trends" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/trends">Google Trends</a> are similar but lacks the insights contained by the behavioral patterns enhanced with the sheer number of profiles.  For example, a brand manager can find out whether or not Pepsi&#8217;s brand profile on the web engaged with younger female audiences than Coca-Cola&#8217;s and how they compare.<br />
It was a lot of fun dreaming up that product when I was at Yahoo!  It was fun to work at Yahoo! during those times when we were routinely innovating with new concepts and technology.  In fact, the Yahoo! Buzz Index predated Google&#8217;s Zeigeist and Google Trends by over 4 years.  Glad to finally see the patent has been granted.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stanleywong.org/2007/01/12/my-yahoo-buzz-index-patent-has-been-granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
