<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mahalo on All Things D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stanleywong.org/2007/07/17/17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stanleywong.org/2007/07/17/17/</link>
	<description>Musings from the Interactive Adman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://stanleywong.org/2007/07/17/17/comment-page-1/#comment-2548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleywong.org/2007/07/17/17/#comment-2548</guid>
		<description>Mahalo for thinking of Mahalo,

Regarding scale I think the first question you have to ask yourself is do we need to scale. What if human&#039;s powered the top 1/3rd of search and machines did the next 2/3rds... would that be valuable enough? Search is a very, very big market and making the top 1/3rd of searches 5-10x better might be enough... no?

best,

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahalo for thinking of Mahalo,</p>
<p>Regarding scale I think the first question you have to ask yourself is do we need to scale. What if human&#8217;s powered the top 1/3rd of search and machines did the next 2/3rds&#8230; would that be valuable enough? Search is a very, very big market and making the top 1/3rd of searches 5-10x better might be enough&#8230; no?</p>
<p>best,</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
