Don’t Ignore the Long Tail

Great post by Rand Fishkin on SEOMoz.  Check it out…

SEOmoz Whiteboard Friday – Ignore the Tail at Your Peril! from Scott Willoughby on Vimeo.

SEOmoz Whiteboard Friday – Ignore the Tail at Your Peril!

del.icio.us:Don't Ignore the Long Tail digg:Don't Ignore the Long Tail spurl:Don't Ignore the Long Tail wists:Don't Ignore the Long Tail simpy:Don't Ignore the Long Tail newsvine:Don't Ignore the Long Tail blinklist:Don't Ignore the Long Tail furl:Don't Ignore the Long Tail reddit:Don't Ignore the Long Tail fark:Don't Ignore the Long Tail blogmarks:Don't Ignore the Long Tail Y!:Don't Ignore the Long Tail smarking:Don't Ignore the Long Tail magnolia:Don't Ignore the Long Tail segnalo:Don't Ignore the Long Tail

Business models?

For a long time, I’ve been perplexed by the number of businesses on the Web that have sprung up around a free or “freemium” model.  These businesses have the potential of creating huge number of users and usage but no clear way of making money.

In this excellent blog post by 37 signals, “The bar set in our industry is too low“, talks about the idea of offering for free and then “hoping and praying” the company will make money later.  People in the Web industry have touted, “success based upon future results” is not sustainable unless there is a real business model behind it.  Too many times I’ve heard at industry events: We can build a huge audience now and we’ll figure out how to make money later.

The first wave of Facebook apps grew huge audiences but saw their online advertising rates erode due to the fact there wasn’t a lot of intent or enough relevance for advertisers built into the apps being built.  The group of savvy second wave of FB app builders borrowed the model of paid virtual goods, popular in Asia, and have built very solid business models.  In the meantime first generation FB app companies such as Slide and RockYou, who have seen sky high valuations, have seen their growth stall since it became impossible to reach the lofty expectations set.

Another example, FreeConferenceCall.com offers simply to host free conference calls.  We use this service in my line of business every day.  Their website’s FAQ states in response to the question, “What’s the catch?”:  “There is no catch! There are no advertisements to listen to, no quality issues, no hidden fees, no sales pitches, no contracts, no purchases required, no privacy problems, no limitations or restrictions, and no surprises.”  I realize they have the ability to upsell more advanced services such as larger packages or voicemail systems but surely the number of people partaking in the free conference calls dwarf any paying customers.  It seems to me their loss leader has more value than their “for pay” services.

Hope and pray is not a new business model solution.

del.icio.us:Business models? digg:Business models? spurl:Business models? wists:Business models? simpy:Business models? newsvine:Business models? blinklist:Business models? furl:Business models? reddit:Business models? fark:Business models? blogmarks:Business models? Y!:Business models? smarking:Business models? magnolia:Business models? segnalo:Business models?

Who rules Real-Time search?

I’ve been following the whole emergence of real time search lately. Very interested to see a whole raft of new entrants emerge to tackle real time search using a variety of techniques. Tweetmeme, for example, is using more of a Digg.com approach. Topsy has an algorithm weighted around authority of the poster. This article on VentureBeat is very interesting in that it gives a great overview of the space.

I did a quick query on Quantcast to see which of these sites have the most amount of traffic:

RT Search Engine          Monthly Users
search.twitter.com               688.3K
friendfeed.com                   202.8K
tweetmeme.com                    202.1K
oneriot.com                       28.7K
scoopler.com            not enough data
topsy.com               not enough data
almost.at               not enough data
dailyrt.com             not enough data
twazzup.com             not enough data
collecta.com              just launched

Google’s Larry Page has stated publicly this is an area they are weak in currently, though I’ve been noticing more and more inclusion of real time search results lately.

del.icio.us:Who rules Real-Time search? digg:Who rules Real-Time search? spurl:Who rules Real-Time search? wists:Who rules Real-Time search? simpy:Who rules Real-Time search? newsvine:Who rules Real-Time search? blinklist:Who rules Real-Time search? furl:Who rules Real-Time search? reddit:Who rules Real-Time search? fark:Who rules Real-Time search? blogmarks:Who rules Real-Time search? Y!:Who rules Real-Time search? smarking:Who rules Real-Time search? magnolia:Who rules Real-Time search? segnalo:Who rules Real-Time search?

Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal

I love how this integrates with the context of the page and goes outside of the box to do something unexpected for users.  The ad takes the “I’m a Mac. I’m a PC” to the online advertising realm by taking advantage of the space provided by standard LREC and Leaderboard banners.  Very creative.

Also check out a review from Ad Age… here.

del.icio.us:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal digg:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal spurl:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal wists:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal simpy:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal newsvine:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal blinklist:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal furl:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal reddit:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal fark:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal blogmarks:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal Y!:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal smarking:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal magnolia:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal segnalo:Awesome New Apple Online Ad on Wall Street Journal

Real Time Streams becoming more relevant

Great article on TechCrunch today about “Jump Into the Stream” and how we are in an interesting shift to real time streamed information.  The biggest challenge is to make sense of this deluge of information and to figure out what is meaningful and what is meaningless.

With Google making some rumbling about real time search this is going to get really interesting.  Much like SEO is used to drive traffic to web 1.0 websites, social bookmarking and social discovery was used to drive traffic to websites in Web 2.0.  Web 3.0 may be where we see another source of traffic generation through different real time feeds and streams.  An indication of this is Mark Cuban’s recent blog post about how he is getting more and more traffic from twitter and facebook than Google.  In his case it is definitely Streams (Facebook + Twitter) > SEO (Google).

Very intent to see where this leads us.

del.icio.us:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant digg:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant spurl:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant wists:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant simpy:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant newsvine:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant blinklist:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant furl:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant reddit:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant fark:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant blogmarks:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant Y!:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant smarking:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant magnolia:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant segnalo:Real Time Streams becoming more relevant

Malcom Gladwell’s How David Beats Goliath

Interesting new article in The New Yorker by Malcom Gladwell (Outliers, The Tipping Point) about How David Beats Goliath.  Basically a great article on disruption.  The article reminds me of Clayton Christensen’s work on the Innovator’s Dilemma series where upstarts can come into an industry and disrupt well established players.  Great stuff for anyone wanting to build a startup.

“…substituting effort for ability turns out to be a winning formula for underdogs in all walks of life…”

Throw out the conventional.  If you are building a startup you have to be willing to go above and beyond what is conventional and disrupt your competition.

A great read.  Check it out here.

del.icio.us:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath digg:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath spurl:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath wists:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath simpy:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath newsvine:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath blinklist:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath furl:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath reddit:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath fark:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath blogmarks:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath Y!:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath smarking:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath magnolia:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath segnalo:Malcom Gladwell's How David Beats Goliath

Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009

Razorfish a very well respected digital agency just released their Digital Outlook for 2009.  This annual report discusses the trends that are happening in digital marketing and advertising.

Some interesting trends from the report:

  • Emergence of Ad Exchanges
  • Social Influence Marketing
  • Mobile marketing
  • and much more…

Well worth the read.

del.icio.us:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 digg:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 spurl:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 wists:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 simpy:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 newsvine:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 blinklist:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 furl:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 reddit:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 fark:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 blogmarks:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 Y!:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 smarking:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 magnolia:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009 segnalo:Razorfish Digital Outlook for 2009

Opportunities in Online Advertising

The main reason we decided to start Permuto was we saw a huge opportunity in online advertising.  Online advertising is a critical service which allows millions of publishers, social networks, and other services to provide so many low cost services on the web.

Online advertising is still in its infancy, where the amount of time spent on the Internet is roughly equal to the amount of time spent by the average American watching TV.  However, the amount of money being spent on the Internet is roughly a third of TV.

To bridge the gulf the online advertising spend, the challenge for marketers is to innovate and really bring out what is special and unique about this medium while making it scalable in its reach to touch millions of people who utilize the web.  The company that unlock this potential will be huge.

The industry is still young.  Lots of potential and much opportunity.

del.icio.us:Opportunities in Online Advertising digg:Opportunities in Online Advertising spurl:Opportunities in Online Advertising wists:Opportunities in Online Advertising simpy:Opportunities in Online Advertising newsvine:Opportunities in Online Advertising blinklist:Opportunities in Online Advertising furl:Opportunities in Online Advertising reddit:Opportunities in Online Advertising fark:Opportunities in Online Advertising blogmarks:Opportunities in Online Advertising Y!:Opportunities in Online Advertising smarking:Opportunities in Online Advertising magnolia:Opportunities in Online Advertising segnalo:Opportunities in Online Advertising

Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger

There has been a lot of press about the problems at Yahoo! and their 100 day quest to reinvigorate the company. With all this bad press, one has to remember that Yahoo! has:

  • Huge consumer audience – check
  • Large advertising base/reach – check
  • Number of branded websites – check
  • Recognizable Brand Name – check

In short, Yahoo! has all the assets stacked in their favor to succeed. In the end it really boils down to:

Execution, Execution, Execution!

That’s about it. The only “sacred cow” that needs to be sacrificed by Yahoo! is the slow moving, stagnant, execution killing company culture.

Yahoo! reminds me of the classic movie Rocky 3 where Rocky Balboa has become complacent surrounded by yes men. Rocky’s trainer, Mickey, dies and can no longer protect Rocky. The fierce Clubber Lang (Google, Mr. T in the Movie) beats the living crap out of Rocky. Rocky, through the help of Apollo Creed (played by Steve Jobs), regains his confidence and the “Eye of the Tiger” to learn to fight on his own two feet.

Reinventing (or rediscovering) the company’s killer instinct (Eye of the Tiger) begins and ends with the people @ Yahoo! The way to get it back is to go back to the beginning and remember who Yahoo! really is, focus on the consumer, and (re)learn how to WIN.

del.icio.us:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger digg:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger spurl:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger wists:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger simpy:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger newsvine:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger blinklist:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger furl:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger reddit:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger fark:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger blogmarks:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger Y!:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger smarking:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger magnolia:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger segnalo:Yahoo! & The Eye of the Tiger

Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium

Yahoo! just announced tonight that they acquired Blue Lithium for $300M in an all cash deal. This is an excellent move by Yahoo! to pick up one of the leading companies in the performance marketing space. Blue Lithium boasts a data driven targeting platform that is one of the best in the industry. In light of the recent multi-billion dollar acquisitions of Doubleclick ($3.1B – $300M revenue) by Google and aQuantive ($6B – $442M revenue) by Microsoft, this appears to be a excellent deal for Yahoo!

Update: It is estimated by Mashable.com that Blue Lithium’s revenue for 2006 was $100M+, further evidence that this was a good deal for Yahoo!

Coverage from around the Web:

del.icio.us:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium digg:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium spurl:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium wists:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium simpy:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium newsvine:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium blinklist:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium furl:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium reddit:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium fark:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium blogmarks:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium Y!:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium smarking:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium magnolia:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium segnalo:Excellent Move: Yahoo! Acquires Blue Lithium
Next Page »